Meet the Top 10 Grand Finalists
Selected from more than 300 participants. Watch the Round 1 performances that took them to the Grand Finale stage on 28 October.
The Next Top 20 Performances
Outstanding speakers who came close to the finale. Ranked from the public scoreboard.
Evaluation, Results & Competition Portal
Portal navigation is handled by pure HTML/CSS, so Judge, Reviewer, Results and Admin screens open even if a later JavaScript function encounters an error. Data is stored securely in the Supabase database. This build restores the full administration suite: analytics, evaluation records, score breakdowns, school management, bulk finalization and overall results.
Judge Evaluation
Registered first-stage judges use the original official /100 rubric.
Reviewer Judge Portal
Reviewer Judges watch finalist videos and use the separate finalist-selection /100 rubric.
Published Results
View published school/college results, overall ranking, feedback and video links.
Administration
Dashboard, rank register, participants, evaluation records, analytics and school management.
Judge Access
Select your registered name and enter any active organiser access code.
Welcome,
Evaluate Participant
Your entry is kept as a local draft until you submit.
Reviewer Judge Access
Every active Reviewer Judge sees every participant in the common review pool for which they are part of the reviewer panel.
Reviewer Judge:
Students Sent for Review
Published Results
Select an institution, or open the overall ranking once every participant has been resolved.
Administrator
Admin Dashboard
Home Page — Scored Candidate Ranking
Live Results — every active participant
| Rank | Student | School | Topic | Judges | Reviewer | Average | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading... | |||||||
Rank Board — finalized participants
| Rank | Participant | School / College | Class | Topic | Round 1 Avg | Reviewer Round Avg | Final Score | Review status / remark | Public status (Home page) | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | ||||||||||
Pending — results not yet finalized
| Participant | School / College | Topic | Judges so far | Current average | Projection |
|---|
Grand Finale Re-Registrations
| Status | Student | School / College | Father | Mother | Class | Contact | Round 1 Topic | Finale Topic | Language | Preparation | Parent Consent | Registered At | Action |
|---|
Official Rank-wise Participant Register
| Rank | School Rank | Student | Father Name | School | Class | Topic | Mobile | All Judge Scores | Round 1 Avg | Reviewer Avg | Final /100 | Video | Review Status | Action |
|---|
Participant Status Centre
| Student | Father | School | Class | Topic | Judges | Rev | Avg | Review Status | Final | Public | Active | Open |
|---|
+ Add Participant On the Spot
Edit Participant Details
Judge Scores / Evaluation Records
| Timestamp | Judge | Slot | Student | School | Topic | Total | Remarks | Status | Action |
|---|
Reviewer Judging Progress
Every participant in an open review round is visible to every active Reviewer Judge, including judges added after the participant was sent. Use Finalise score to close a round with whatever number of reviewers have submitted — all of their scores then count in the final average.
| Student | School | Topic | Status | Progress | Reviewer Scores | Pending With | Red Flags | Round 1 Avg | Round 1 + Reviewer (Final) | Action |
|---|
Reviewer Judge Management
| Name | Affiliation | Mobile | In Pool | Completed | Pending | Added | Status | Action |
|---|
Original Judge Management
| Name | Affiliation | Mobile | Submitted | Added | Status | Action |
|---|
School / College Management
Renaming an institution updates the name on every participant, evaluation, reviewer-pool and reviewer-evaluation row that references it.
| School / College | Participants | Finalized | Published |
|---|
Competition Analytics
Live, auditable analysis across participants, schools/colleges, judges, topics and every judgement parameter.
| School / College | Participants | Evaluated | Finalized | Completion % | Coverage % | Avg Judges | Official Avg | Median | Review Cases | Top Participant | Publication |
|---|
| Topic | Registered | Evaluated | Finalized | Average | Median | Top Participant |
|---|
Language
| Language | Students | Finalized | Completion | Average |
|---|
Age Groups
| Age Group | Students | Finalized | Completion | Average |
|---|
| Judge | Affiliation | Evaluations | Students | Schools | Average | Median | SD | Tendency | Consistency |
|---|
Lower mean absolute difference (MAD) means closer scoring. Correlation closer to +1 means the judges rank participants similarly.
| Judge A | Judge B | Shared Students | MAD | Correlation | Avg A | Avg B | Assessment |
|---|
| Judge | School / College | Evaluations | Average Given |
|---|
| Rank | Criterion | Max | Avg Mark | Median | Avg % | SD | Discrimination | <60% | ≥80% | Profile |
|---|
+1 = very strong positive relationship; 0 = little linear relationship; negative values move in opposite directions. Correlation does not prove causation.
| Rank | Participant | School | Topic | Judges | Final | Band |
|---|
| Participant | School | Judges | Average | Min | Max | Range | SD |
|---|
| Participant | School | Topic | Judgements | Current Avg | Action |
|---|
| Severity | Signal | Participant / Judge | Detail | Action |
|---|
| Judge | School / College | Evaluations | Average Given |
|---|
System Connection Test
Checks that the browser can reach the Supabase database and reports how many rows each table has.
Backup
Downloads one .zip file with every table as a CSV file (the admin PIN and judge access codes are not included). Do this once a month and keep the file private: it contains phone numbers.